Most of modern computers come with Secure Boot enabled by default, which is a requirement for Windows 10 certification process. Would disabling Secure Boot in Ventoy help? Any progress towards proper secure boot support without using mokmanager? Format Ext4 in Linux: sudo mkfs -t ext4 /dev/sdb1 You can use these commands to format it: But i have added ISO file by Rufus. Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). You can open the ISO in 7zip and look for yourself. Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. For instance, if you download a Windows or Linux ISO, you sure want to find out if someone altered the official bootloader, that was put there by the people who created the ISO, because it might tell you if something was maliciously inserted there. 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' 6. (Haswell Processor) Tested in Memdisk and normal mode with 1.0.08b2. . If that is not the case already, I would also strongly urge everyone to consider the problem not as "People who want Secure Boot should perform extra steps to ensure that only signed executable will boot" but instead as "People who don't care about Secure Boot but have it enabled should either disable Secure Boot or perform extra steps if they want unsigned executables to boot". UEFi64? It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. You can't. I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. Something about secure boot? When install Ventoy, maybe an option for user to choose. You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. Sign in However what currently happens is that people who do have Secure Boot enabled will currently not be alerted to these at all. ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! @pbatard Correct me if I'm wrong, but even with physical access, the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file Now there's no need to format the disk again and again or to extract anything-- with Ventoy simply copy the ISO file to the USB drive and boot it. access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:25 PM Steve Si ***@***. Ubuntu.iso). preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip Does shim still needed in this case? Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. V4 is legacy version. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. Besides, I'm considering that: But . @MFlisar Hiren's Boot CD was down with UEFI (legacy still has some problem), manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT Well occasionally send you account related emails. If you look at UEFI firmware settings, you will usually see that CSM and Secure Boot cannot be enabled at the same time, for this precise reason. The point of this issue is that people are under the impression that because Ventoy supports Secure Boot, they will get the same level of "security" booting Secure Boot compliant media through Ventoy as if they had booted that same media directly, which is indeed a fair expectation to have, since the whole point of boot media creation software is to have the converted media behave as close as possible as the original would. lo importante es conocer las diferencias entre uefi y bios y tambien entre gpt y mbr. The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. However the solution is not perfect enough. For the two bugs. And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). when the user Secure Boots via MokManager - even when booting signed efi files of Ubuntu or Windows? This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. Copyright Windows Report 2023. Ventoy does not always work under VBox with some payloads. 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy memz.mp4. This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. Although a .efi file with valid signature is not equivalent to a trusted system. Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. For instance, it could be that only certain models of PC have this problem with certain specific ISOs. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? privacy statement. BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . I thought that Secure Boot chain of trust is reused for TPM key sealing, but thinking about it more, that wouldn't really work. Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. The file formats that Ventoy supports include ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files. Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. Do I still need to display a warning message? puedes usar las particiones gpt o mbr. It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. They can choose to run a signed Ubuntu EFI file and Ventoy can change it's default function using scripts and file injection. Porteus-CINNAMON-v4.0-x86_64.iso - 321 MB, APorteus-MULTI-v20.03.19-x86_64.iso - 400 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-32_Beta-1.2.iso - 1.92 GB, Paragon_Hard_Disk_Manager_15_Premium_10.1.25.1137_WinPE_x64.iso - 514 MB, pureos-9.0-plasma-live_20200328-amd64.hybrid.iso - 1.65 GB, pfSense-CE-2.4.5-RELEASE-amd64.iso - 738 MB, FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200319-r359106-disc1.iso - 928 MB, wifislax64-1.1-final.iso - 2.18 GB Thanks. This means current is UEFI mode. By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. and select the efisys.bin from desktop and save the .iso Now the Minitool.iso should boot into UEFI with Ventoy. It gets to the root@archiso ~ # prompt just fine using first boot option. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. Is there any progress about secure boot support? How to Perform a Clean Install of Windows 11. It's the BIOS that decides the boot mode not Ventoy. You literally move files around and use a text editor to edit theme.text, ventoy.json, and so on. Please test and tell your opinion. I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> We recommend downloading this PC Repair tool (rated Great on TrustPilot.com) to easily address them. Some bioses have a bug. Hi, HDClone can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode for legacy BIOS, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. If the ISO is on the tested list, then clearly it is a problem with your particular equipment, so you need to give the details. What you want is for users to be alerted if someone picked a Linux or Microsoft media, and the UEFI bootloader was altered from the original. Error message: The Flex image does not support BIOS\Legacy boot - only UEFI64. If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250, https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists, chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin, https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso, https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s, https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA. Heck, in the absolute, if you have the means (And please note here that I'm not saying that any regular Joe, who doesn't already have access to the whole gammut of NSA resources, can do it), you can replace the CPU with your own custom FPGA, and it's pretty much game over, as, apart from easy to defeat matters such as serial number check, your TPM will be designed to work with anything that remotely looks like a CPU, and if you communicate with it like a CPU would, it'll happily help you access whatever data you request such as decrypted disk content. What exactly is the problem? PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. privacy statement. @steve6375 Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? Yes. Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. And, unfortunately, with Ventoy as it stands, this whole trust mechanism is indeed broken, because you can take an official Windows installation ISO, insert a super malicious UEFI bootloader (that performs a Windows installation while also installing malware) and, even if users have Secure Boot enabled (and added Ventoy in Mok manager), they will not be alerted at all that they are running a malicious bootloader, whereas this is the whole point of Secure Boot! Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. So, yeah, it's the same as a safe manufacturer, on seeing that you have a room with extra security (e.g. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. I have a solution for this. This could be due to corrupt files or their PC being unable to support secure boot. https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists. Currently there is only a Secure boot support option for check. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. Menu. also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. git clone git clone When Secure Boot is enabled, BIOS boot (CSM) should not work at all, since it would completely defeat the purpose of only allowing signed executables to boot. That is the point. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. That's not at all how I see it (and from what I read above also not @ventoy sees it). slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB I tested Manjaro ISO KDE X64. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI Sign in But this time I get The firmware encountered an unexpected exception. No. @shasheene of Rescuezilla knows about the problem and they are investigating. For these who select to bypass secure boot. So, Secure Boot is not required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! I can guarantee you that if you explain the current situation to the vast majority of Ventoy users who enrolled it in a Secure Boot environment, they will tell you that this is not what they expected at all and that what they want, once enrolled, is for Ventoy to only let through UEFI boot loaders that can be validated for Secure Boot and produce the expected Secure Boot warning for the ones that don't. backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. Any kind of solution? 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, but the solution is not perfect enough. all give ERROR on my PC A lot of work to do. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. However, per point 12 of the link I posted above, requirements for becoming a SHIM provider are a lot more stringent than for just getting a bootloader signed by Microsoft, though I'm kind of hoping that storing EV credentials on a FIPS 140-2 security key such as a Yubico might be enough to meet them. privacy statement. If you use the Linux kernel's EFI stub loader or ELILO, you may need to store your kernel on the ESP, so creating an ESP on the large end of the scale is advisable. Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. Keeping Ventoy and ISO files updated can help avoid any future booting issues with Ventoy. orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB Don't get me wrong, I understand your concerns and support your position. @ventoy used Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk files to disable UEFI file policy, that's the easiest way, but not a 'proper' one. Discovery and usage of shim protocol of loaded shim binary for global UEFI validation functions (validation policy override with shim verification), Shim protocol unregistration of loaded shim binary (to prevent confusion among shims of multiple vendors and registration of multiple protocols which are handled by different chainloaded shims). That's because, if they did want to boot non Secure Boot enabled ones, they would disable Secure Boot themselves. Copy the efisys.bin from C: > Windows > Boot > DVD > EFI > en-US to your desktop 3. All the .efi files may not be booted. 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===> Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. Yes, I already understood my mistake. to your account, Hello But it shouldn't be to the user to do that. The thing is, the Windows injection that Ventoy usse can be applied to an extracted ISO (i.e. Still having issues? However, after adding firmware packages Ventoy complains Bootfile not found. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. FreeNAS-11.3-U2.1.iso (FreeBSD based) tested using ventoy-1.0.08 hung during boot in both bios and uefi at the following error; da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI And if you somehow let bootloaders that shouldn't be trusted through, such as unsigned ones, then it means your whole chain of trust is utterly broken, because there simply cannot even exist a special case for "USB" vs "something else". You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. Can't say for others, but I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. Any ideas? Ventoy2Disk.exe always failed to install ? Hi MFlisar , if you want use that now with HBCD you must extract the iso but the ventoy.dat on the root of the iso recreate the iso with example: ntlite oder oder tools and than you are able to boot from. If you pull the USB drive out immediately after finish copy a big ISO file, most probably the file in the USB will be corrupted. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. Tested ISO: https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. Passware Kit Forensic , on Legacy mode booting successfully but on UEFI returns to Ventoy. If you have a faulty USB stick, then youre likely to encounter booting issues. The MX21_February_x64.iso seems OK in VirtualBox for me. Thank you Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. You can put a file with name .ventoyignore in the specific directory. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. Yes. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' Let the user access their computer (fat chance they're going to remove the heatsink and thermal paste to see if their CPU was changed, especially if, as far as they are concerned, no change as occurred and both the computer appearance and behaviour are indistinguishable from usual). Please thoroughly test the archive and give your feedback, what works and what don't. It's the job of Ventoy's custom GRUB to ensure that what is being chainloaded is Secure Boot compliant because that's what users will expect from a trustworthy boot application in a Secure Boot environment. Ventoy is supporting almost all of Arch-based Distros well. Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. This filesystem offers better compatibility with Window OS, macOS, and Linux. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Can it boot ok? ^^ maybe a lenovo / thinkpad / thinkcentre issue ? https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?t=4997. For me I'm missing Hiren's Boot CD (https://www.hirensbootcd.org/) - it's WindowsPE based and supports UEFI from USB. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. Tested on 1.0.77. Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. The only thing that changed is that the " No bootfile found for UEFI!" Installation & Boot. Fix them with this tool: If the advices above haven't solved your issue, your PC may experience deeper Windows problems. I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. Will these functions in Ventoy be disabled if Secure Boot is detected? I hope there will be no issues in this adoption. Main Edition Support. Download Debian net installer. Exactly. Windows 10 32bit only support IA32 efi, your machine may be x86_64 uefi (amd64 uefi), so this distro can't boot and will show this message. Expect working results in 3 months maximum. Just create a FAT32 partition, change its label to ARCH_YYYYMM (fill in the ISO's date, now it would be ARCH_202109) and extract the Arch ISO to it. This iso seems to have some problem with UEFI. I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. Have a question about this project? So I think that also means Ventoy will definitely impossible to be a shim provider. The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. MD5: f424a52153e6e5ed4c0d44235cf545d5 FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". Also ZFS is really good. Does the iso boot from a VM as a virtual DVD? function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. I am not using a grub external menu. Perform a scan to check if there are any existing errors on the USB. I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support.